|THE “BIG REGISTRY:” THE BOOMING SEX OFFENDER INDUSTRY
Derek “The Fallen One” Logue
Created November 21, 2009
“It is a very dangerous thing… Not only sex sells, but sex offenders sell .” Fear and loathing have generated big
bucks in an otherwise bad economy. From iPhone apps to companies selling your personal information to those
individuals advocating these laws, the sex offender business has become a major industry, raking in untold billions
of dollars annually. Like all industries, however, those profiting from the sex offender registry have no real incentive
to tell the public the truth about sex offenders and the laws affecting their lives. In fact, many of the organizations
profiting from the sex offender industry lobby, misinform, and mislead the public.
Those profiting from the sex offender industry behave much like the industries involved in “Big Tobacco” and “Big
Oil.” Powerful lobbyists pass laws to put money directly into their own pockets. The media largely ignores studies
which reveal the negative impact of sex offender legislation, while efforts are made to suppress or “debunk” these
studies. The media blasts high-profile but rare sex crimes incessantly over the airwaves, while celebrity advocates
make public appeals for more support and money while spreading their own myths and lies. Thus, the sex offender
registry could be described as “Big Registry.”
There is not currently any study which shows exactly how much Americans are spending on the sex offender
registry. This article is not exhaustive. It is not impossible to determine an exact amount, but best left in the hands of
researchers with far more time and money. The purpose of this article is to shed light on the many ways the sex
offender industry is profiting from one of the most controversial and ineffective criminal justice methods ever devised
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY
The Big Registry generates big bucks for organizations that lobby for tough sex-crime legislation. Below are the
budgets of two well-known organizations, The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) and
Parents For Megan’s Law (PFML):
NCMEC Annual Report 2007 
Federal Funding - $29.8 million
Total Funds - $42.9 million
Other Contributions - $ 13.1 million
Expenses - $ 40.6 Million
2007 profit - $ 2.3 million
Total assets - $29.3 million
Ernie Allen’s Salary - $410k + $427k in benefits
John Walsh’s benefits - $38k
PFML tax form 2007 
Public support - $56,658
Govt Grants - $879,000
Total - $1.1 million
Expenses - $900,000
Profit - $210,000
Assets - $264,000
Ahern’s salary - $107,323
Almost 10% of total funds went to Ahern’s salary alone!
It is not surprising the heads of these “non-profit” organizations make large salaries. What is surprising, however, is
that most of those “expenses” listed are all employee salaries and fundraising expenses. Below are the 2007
salaries of the heads of some of these organizations:
Salary comparisons 2007  :
Ernie Allen [NCMEC] $837k
Xavier Von Erck [Perverted-Justice] $120k
Laura Ahern [PFML] $107k
Mark Lunsford [Lunsford Foundation] $44k
Klaas Family [Klaas Kids] $46k
The NCMEC, the largest of the well-known “non-profit” organizations, has not been without controversy. The NCMEC
does not physically search for children; local law enforcement agents search for children. Instead, the NCMEC
distributes fliers of missing children (again, not physically), runs a fingerprinting and DNA campaign, and fundraises.
The NCMEC, along with founder John Walsh was described as “cause-related marketing,” and “they don’t look for
children, they look for money .”
The NCMEC was founded under the myth of “50,000 missing children” every year, and criticisms of inflating statistics
and misleading the public to generate profits still plague its nearly 30-year existence .
John Walsh, a founder of the NCMEC, collects a portion of their funding as compensation and for lobbying . In
turn, the NCMEC stands to collect more government funds from the controversial Adam Walsh Act ; the Act also
gives the NCMEC a great deal of immunity from lawsuits . Thus, it is no surprise John Walsh has staunchly
advocated for funding the Adam Walsh Act  , even enlisting the help of Oprah Winfrey to campaign for funding
the Act .
John Walsh has faced fierce criticism for propagating myths to the media and Congress, including testifying before
Congress “1.5 million missing kids annually” and claiming our land is “littered with mutilated, decapitated, raped and
strangled children” . Recently Walsh has been criticized from promoting the Adam Walsh Act, which allows teens
as young as age 14 to be listed on the national sex offender registry . Despite the mounting criticisms and
articles showing teens are indeed placed on the registry for consensual offenses, John Walsh still denies the AWA
would do that, claiming it is only for those who “physically or violently offended someone and you’re a repeat
offender.” In his recent interview, Walsh propagates another myth, claiming the registry has lost track of 100,000
“level three sex offenders” . The “100,000 missing sex offenders” claim is just one of the many myths used to
justify high-priced, ineffective legislation.
LOBBYING THE INDUSTRY
With billions of dollars at stake, the Big Registry has relied on outlandish statistics and appeals to emotion that
shock and scare the public . Inflated statistics, such as the “Goldilocks Number ,” are created to justify the
need for their products. John Walsh had stated on ABC’s Nightline there are “100,000 missing level three sex
offenders .” Chris Hansen of NBC Dateline’s controversial “To Catch a Predator” series claimed there were
“50,000 internet predators” online at anyone time . Many of these inflated statistics can be found on various
websites promoting their services, such as Family Watchdog and Klaas Kids. Where did these statistics come from?
In the case of the 50,000 internet predator claim, apparently it was conjured out of thin air in order to promote a
trashy quasi-reality show and shock the public .
The “100,000 missing predators” myth was derived from a flawed study by the group Parents For Megan’s Law
(PFML). This study, conducted in 2002, relied on a telephone call to states to ask how many sex offenders were
complying with registration requirements. Of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia, only 32 states gave
estimates, and the study estimated “roughly” 24% of the registrants did not comply, and since there were around
460,000 registrants in 2002, PFML estimated it at 100,000 . Flaws with the study were reported early; most
states never audited their sex offender registries and gave only estimates of their accuracy, while 18 states and the
District of Columbia gave no estimates at all . This did not stop PFML from releasing the seriously flawed study
as statistical fact. And despite being thoroughly debunked, these myths are still cited on myriads of websites and
media articles even today! It is worth noting that Laura Ahern, founder of Parents For Megan’s Law, also exploited
local high-profile cases to gain national attention, and recently received a half-million dollar grant to create an email
alert system .
Many of the sites that promote the Big Registry go beyond inflating (or creating) statistics; many actively attack or
suppress valid studies that debunk the various myths these businesses propagate. In 2008, Maureen Kanka fought
to have a research study proving Megan’s Law ineffective suppressed . Later, Kanka released a statement
claiming Megan’s law was never intended to be a crime deterrent, claiming the purpose of the registry was to
increase public awareness . Within 24 hours of the release of the Human Rights Watch report in 2007 on the
negative impact of sex offender laws, Family Watchdog hastily created a blog on their website to “respond to” and
debunk the report . Why would these organizations lobby so hard to debunk valid studies? The answer lies in
the preferred method of promoting the Big Registry.
FEAR MONGERS AND TEAR JERKERS
Fear mongering and appeals to emotion have been the driving force behind the Big Registry since its inception. The
public registry came on the heels of the tragic case of Megan Kanka, with the claim, “If only we had known about sex
offenders in our neighborhood, we could have prevented this case” . John Walsh frequently appeals to his
deceased son in support of funding the Adam Walsh Act , even though his son was not killed by a registered sex
offender or a pedophile . The reactions to such high-profile cases fueled by fear-laden media reports has been
a nation of fearful “helicopter parents” . Based on the money pumped into the Big Registry, fear also sells .
Thin Air Wireless, creator of the controversial “Offender Locator” iPhone App, makes the ominous statement, “They
know where you live. Now it’s time to turn the tables on them” . The App became one of the top sellers within
days of its release . The founder of Thin Air Wireless, Howard “Trip” Wakefield, relies on fear mongering to
justify using his product; he states in one article, “If I was going to take my child to the park and I see that the area is
infested with child predators and I look up one that isn't, I'm going to take them to the one that isn't" . On the
Offender Locator Facebook page, in addition to using scary avatars to pinpoint locations of registrants in the area,
Trip claims by not using his product, you are “playing Russian Roulette with the safety of your loved ones” . Of
course, this was only one of three so-called “Peace of Mind” products offered by Thin Air Wireless . The
controversial App was temporarily suspended because selling personal information violated California law  . This
has not stopped other organizations from boldly proclaiming sex offender information was “going corporate” .
Other organizations have jumped on the Big Registry bandwagon, including Offendar, a company offering devices
that read GPS devices to warn of sex offenders in the area , Masonic chip implants for “identification purposes”
, and even the Ku Klux Klan .
Perhaps no man has come under more criticism, scrutiny, and controversy than Mark Lunsford. The criticism of
Lunsford and his “Jessica Marie Lunsford Foundation” began to surface when Lunsford announced he was suing
the Citrus County, FL Sheriff’s Office for the wrongful death of his daughter, Jessica. First came the feud with a local
shock jock, who accused Lunsford of just suing “for the money” and questioned his spending habits , then came
scrutiny from the local media on how Lunsford’s foundation spent the donation money and used donated equipment,
most of which was never reported to the IRS . Amid the controversy, the Lunsford Foundation disbanded, and
Lunsford began collecting a paycheck from Hank Asher, the former drug-runner turned multimillionaire information
seller. After Lunsford disbanded his foundation, around $400,000 in assets were unaccounted for, and former
members of his Board of Directors have claimed Lunsford pocketed the money, living like a “rock star.” Mark Klaas,
while claiming never to be paid by a for-profit industry, applauded Lunsford’s work with Asher . Lunsford, as a
board member of the group Stop Child Predators, is also partnered with Thin Air Wireless .
STATE OF THE ECONOMY
Individuals and businesses are not the only entities looking to cash in on the Big Registry. The federal government
earmarks millions of dollars in grants to various local, state, and federal government agencies, as well as private
business (such as therapists) working in the criminal justice system. Decisions to not enforce certain laws, like the
Adam Walsh Act, mean law enforcement agencies fighting for a share of JAG/Byrne grants could lose 10% of those
funds . Below are just a few ways in which law enforcement and other criminal justice agencies are exploiting the
laws to generate profits.
States get federal funding for the registry under SOMA based on the number of offenders on the state registry.
Thus, it came as little surprise when it was reported Florida’s public registry listed 541 dead sex offenders, 807
deported offenders, 7173 out of state offenders, and 8260 incarcerated offenders on the state’s public registry,
roughly half of the reported 36,000 registrants for the year 2005 . Ironically, this is the state Parents For Megan’
s Law considers Florida one of the “highest compliance rates”  and has given the grade “A+” for their registry
. Another growing trend is law enforcement agencies forcing registrants to pay registration fees to supplement
costs already covered in the law enforcement grant .
Civil commitment has been a costly method of incarcerating individuals long after their prison sentences are
completed. Costs to keep registrants in civil commitment centers range from $32,000 to $180,000 per year per
registrant . Out of over 3000 in civil commitment centers across the country, only 50 have “graduated” from a
program, while double the amount were released due to other factors . One sex offender cost the state over
$600,000 to keep in a civil commitment center for a year and a half after the doctors cleared him for release .
The Minnesota civil commitment program also came under fire after spending over $70 million on their program
while releasing no one from their programs. The program saw great increases in the committed population following
the Dru Sjodin murder .
Adam Walsh Act
The Adam Walsh Act must implemented by June 2010 or face a 10% cut in Jag/ Byrne law enforcement funding .
Also at stake are millions of dollars to assorted programs such as Fugitive Safe Surrender, child fingerprinting
programs, registration compliance programs, and other sex offender-related programs, as well as Big Brothers Big
Sisters . However, as evidenced from John Walsh’s lobbying for funding, the Adam Walsh Act is a largely
unfunded mandate, which may influence states’ decisions on whether or not to implement this asinine bill. When
Ohio passed their version of the Act, SB10, it found the Federal government only had $25 million in funding to divide
amongst 56 US states and territories, while the cost of making the small changes to the registry to become compliant
with the Act alone was around a half million dollars. This did not include upkeep, court costs and potential lawsuits,
and mandatory minimums, which were all considered but no solid figures given . If indeed the Adam Walsh Act
was to receive full funding for all its included programs, would states still adopt the Act? It would take billions of tax
dollars to pay for new registries, civil commitment, GPS pilot programs, mandatory minimums, Title 6 funding, and
other provisions of the Adam Walsh Act.
Speaking of GPS, the program has become heralded as a “valuable” tool in the efforts to track registrants. In one
such program in Massachusetts, the cost of monitoring individuals on GPS was $10 per day per offender in 2004, or
$3650 per year . In 2009 the same state reported it cost $6 million to track the 359 offenders plus 250 suspects
awaiting trial, including the cost of false alarms, or an average cost of $9852.22 per offender . False alarms and
faulty devices have been a common problem, a problem that will likely increase as outdated GPS satellites begin to
fail as early as 2010 . This fact has not stopped businesses from hocking GPS devices to states as demand for
the devices increase .
The Big Registry is a booming business, bucking the trends of even the deep recession of 2008-2009. With billions
of dollars at stake, celebrity advocates, private businesses, and even government and law enforcement agencies
propagate fear, misleading statistics, and outright lies to promote their ventures. Lobbying and mass advertising for
these ventures promote fear based laws that generate big buck for social programs that use their services. Any
studies and arguments to the contrary are conveniently ignored by the mass media, and effective social programs
are ignored in favor of ineffective laws that generate publicity, votes, and most of all, money. Much like Big Oil and
Big Tobacco, the Big Registry has convinced the public these laws are not dangerous, but a necessary product for
our culture. However, the negative impact of these laws is proving the Big Registry is indeed as deceptive and
dangerous as the other “Big” businesses.
|(c) 2007-2010 Derek W. Logue. No part of this website may be used in any way without expressed written consent of the site owner.